public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, wli@holomorphy.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Inconsistancies in /proc (status vs statm) leading to wrong documentation (proc.txt)
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:54:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4167B557.8080202@free.fr> (raw)

Hi,

I'm currently trying use mlockall for a soft RT application and was 
concerned by the memory usage of my (big) RT process. So I stated to 
look at /proc/<PID>/status and /proc/<PID>/statm and then to the 
documentation of statm (Documentation/filesystem/proc.txt) because 
unexplained values are rather useless.

The doc currently says :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Field    Content
  size     total program size (pages)		(same as VmSize in status)
  resident size of memory portions (pages)	(same as VmRSS in status)
  shared   number of pages that are shared	(i.e. backed by a file)
  trs      number of pages that are 'code'	(not including libs; broken,
							includes data segment)
  lrs      number of pages of library		(always 0 on 2.6)
  drs      number of pages of data/stack		(including libs; broken,
							includes library text)
  dt       number of dirty pages			(always 0 on 2.6)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

But when I did cat /proc/<pid>/status and /proc/<pid>/statm  the result 
where rather different (and not only due to size units). Looking at 
/usr/src/linux/fs/proc/task_mmu.c It is not surpising.

May I suggest :
	- To use consistent memory size units between status and statm,
	- To have VmSize and statm return the same global memory size,
	- To eventually display mm->reserved_vm in status and put a word about 
it in the doc,

Of course I can send a patch but I would rather let you decide the way 
you want to go...


Thanks,

-- 
    __
   /  `                   	Eric Valette
  /--   __  o _.          	6 rue Paul Le Flem
(___, / (_(_(__         	35740 Pace

Tel: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76	Fax: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76
E-mail: eric.valette@free.fr




             reply	other threads:[~2004-10-09  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-09  9:54 Eric Valette [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-09 13:49 Inconsistancies in /proc (status vs statm) leading to wrong documentation (proc.txt) Albert Cahalan
2004-10-09 14:08 ` Eric Valette
2004-10-09 16:31   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-09 16:46     ` Eric Valette
2004-10-09 16:59       ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-09 17:46         ` Eric Valette

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4167B557.8080202@free.fr \
    --to=eric.valette@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox