From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267452AbUJIV61 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2004 17:58:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267454AbUJIV61 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2004 17:58:27 -0400 Received: from smtpq2.home.nl ([213.51.128.197]:3787 "EHLO smtpq2.home.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267452AbUJIV6Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2004 17:58:25 -0400 Message-ID: <41685E04.3070103@keyaccess.nl> Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 23:54:12 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denis Zaitsev CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG][2.6.8.1] Something wrong with ISAPnP and serial driver References: <20041010015206.A30047@natasha.ward.six> <4168479C.5080306@keyaccess.nl> <20041010033820.B30047@natasha.ward.six> In-Reply-To: <20041010033820.B30047@natasha.ward.six> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Neem contact op met support@home.nl voor meer informatie X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Denis Zaitsev wrote: > Ok, it isn't listed (USR0009). I'll send a patch. BTW, there is some > other ID - /sys/devices/pnp1/01:01/card_id - and it contains USR0101. > What's this? The PnP card ID, with the USR0009 the PnP device ID; PnP cards can (and often do) have more than one device. For me, they are both the same: $ cat /sys/devices/pnp1/01\:02/{card_,01\:02.00/}id ETT0002 ETT0002 I do believe you need the device ID in 8250_pnp, but try the card ID when it doesn't work, I guess. >>8250 itself finding it was no doubt due to you enabling the port >>yourself so that from its standpoint, it was just another serial port >>already present. > > But why doesn't it find the two standard mb-embedded ports? And why > they are found by 8250_pnp? Is it a normal behaviour? That they are found by 8250_pnp seems okay; onboard ports are normally PnP BIOS devices -- the devices in /sys/devices/pnp0. However, normally the BIOS will have enabled those ports itself meaning 8250 would pick them up already, so no, that's not standard. > Thanks. But what about the incorrect info in /proc/tty/driver/serial? Skipping that one. Maybe that will fix itself once you have the PnP ID listed. Rene. PS: CCing you, but gw.anda.ru seems to have decided I'm a spammer.