From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Ankit Jain <ankitjain1580@yahoo.com>,
linux <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Difference in priority
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:43:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <416A7FE3.8090106@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416A7E25.8050101@kolivas.org>
Con Kolivas wrote:
> Ankit Jain wrote:
>
>> hi
>>
>> if somebody knows the difference b/w /PRI of both
>> these commands because both give different results
>>
>> ps -Al
>> & top
>>
>> as per priority rule we can set priority upto 0-99
>> but top never shows this high priority
>
>
> Priority values 0-99 are real time ones and 100-139 are normal
> scheduling ones. RT scheduling does not change dynamic priority while
> running wheras normal scheduling does (between 100-139). top shows the
> value of the current dynamic priority in the PRI column as the current
> dynamic priority-100. If you have a real time task in top it shows as a
> -ve value. ps -Al seems to show the current dynamic priority+60.
That should read dynamic priority-60 in the PRI column.
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-11 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-11 12:17 Difference in priority Ankit Jain
2004-10-11 12:35 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-11 12:43 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-10-12 9:28 ` Ankit Jain
2004-10-12 10:40 ` Con Kolivas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-12 0:57 Albert Cahalan
2004-10-13 0:15 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-13 1:17 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-13 1:26 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-13 4:58 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-13 5:08 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-10-13 5:39 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=416A7FE3.8090106@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=ankitjain1580@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox