From: John Byrne <john.l.byrne@hp.com>
To: torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Still a mm bug in the fork error path
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:30:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <416C6915.9080201@hp.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]
About a month ago, the thread "[no patch] broken use of mm_release /
activate_mm" ("http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=109510277700003&r=1&w=2")
ended up with the following patch being applied to fork.c:
@@ -1104,9 +1146,7 @@
bad_fork_cleanup_namespace:
exit_namespace(p);
bad_fork_cleanup_mm:
- exit_mm(p);
- if (p->active_mm)
- mmdrop(p->active_mm);
+ mmput(p->mm);
bad_fork_cleanup_signal:
exit_signal(p);
bad_fork_cleanup_sighand:
However, the new code will panic if the thread being forked is a process
with a NULL mm. It looks very unlikely to be hit in the real world, but
it is possible. (My modified kernel makes it much more likely which is
how I found it.) The attached patch is against 2.6.9-rc4. This time for
sure!
John Byrne
[-- Attachment #2: fork.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 423 bytes --]
diff -Nar -U4 linux-2.6.9-rc4/kernel/fork.c new/kernel/fork.c
--- linux-2.6.9-rc4/kernel/fork.c 2004-10-12 16:18:03.661895647 -0700
+++ new/kernel/fork.c 2004-10-12 15:59:14.287779998 -0700
@@ -1145,9 +1145,10 @@
bad_fork_cleanup_namespace:
exit_namespace(p);
bad_fork_cleanup_mm:
- mmput(p->mm);
+ if (p->mm)
+ mmput(p->mm);
bad_fork_cleanup_signal:
exit_signal(p);
bad_fork_cleanup_sighand:
exit_sighand(p);
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-12 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-12 23:30 John Byrne [this message]
2004-10-13 2:09 ` [PATCH] Still a mm bug in the fork error path Linus Torvalds
2004-10-13 3:27 ` John Byrne
2004-10-14 4:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-17 20:26 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=416C6915.9080201@hp.com \
--to=john.l.byrne@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox