From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] lsm: add bsdjail module
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:09:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <416C8048.1000602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041013005856.GA3364@IBM-BWN8ZTBWA01.austin.ibm.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> selinux: user_u:user_r:user_t
>
>
> This is exactly what my current stacker does, to the byte :-)
This is all nice and good, but you have to bring this up with the
SELinux people _now_ since, as I said before, the current
SELinux-enabled userland code might not even start with this change of
the format even if SELinux is not enabled. If it is decided that
/proc/*/attr/current does not belong to SELinux alone, then the guys
should be told about it now so that all the relevant code (libselinux,
kernel without your "stacker" stuff, ...) can be changed before the
current use spreads too far.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBbIBI2ijCOnn/RHQRAqXMAJ96lsdsTsZf3jI+8UXLAziK1iKC2QCfZyZT
zewSIJsYVpIFK2lG0lFcrgY=
=SGiv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-13 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 20:21 (patch 1/3) lsm: add control over /proc/<pid> visibility Serge Hallyn
2004-10-06 20:24 ` [patch 1/3] lsm: add bsdjail module Serge Hallyn
2004-10-06 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-07 4:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-07 6:18 ` James Morris
2004-10-07 6:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-07 16:06 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-07 18:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-07 18:52 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-07 20:56 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-10 6:24 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-07 12:06 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-07 19:01 ` [patch 2/3] " Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-07 19:42 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-07 20:05 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-08 18:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-10 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-10 11:31 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-10 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-11 13:47 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-12 7:00 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-12 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-12 12:27 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-20 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 19:18 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-12 13:11 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-12 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-12 22:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-10-13 0:58 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-13 1:09 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2004-10-13 1:22 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-13 15:26 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-10-13 1:11 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-13 14:25 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-10-06 20:25 ` [patch 3/3] lsm: add bsdjail documentation Serge Hallyn
2004-10-07 22:17 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-10-08 20:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=416C8048.1000602@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox