From: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tasklet usage?
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:32:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <416FD177.1050404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416FCD3E.8010605@drzeus.cx>
Pierre Ossman wrote:
> My driver needs to spend a lot of time inside the interrupt handler
> (draining a FIFO). I suspect this might cause problems blocking other
> interrupt handlers so I was thinking about moving this into a tasklet.
> Not being to familiar with tasklets, a few questions pop up.
>
> * Will a tasklet scheduled from the interrupt handler be executed as
> soon as interrupt handling is done?
I don't _think_ they are guaranteed to be executed immediately after the
interrupt handler top half is complete, but they will execute before
the next return to user space (read: they will complete before user
processes run again).
> * Can tasklets be preempted?
A tasklet can get preempted by a hard interrupt, but tasklets run in
interrupt context, so don't do anything in a tasklet that can call schedule.
> * If a tasklet gets scheduled while running, will it be executed once
> more? (Needed if I get another FIFO interrupt while the tasklet is just
> exiting).
>
IIRC, a tasklet will execute once for every time tasklet_schedule is called.
HTH
Neil
--
/***************************************************
*Neil Horman
*Software Engineer
*Red Hat, Inc.
*nhorman@redhat.com
*gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
*http://pgp.mit.edu
***************************************************/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-15 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-15 13:14 Tasklet usage? Pierre Ossman
2004-10-15 13:32 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2004-10-15 13:46 ` Pierre Ossman
2004-10-15 14:09 ` Neil Horman
2004-10-16 15:17 ` Pierre Ossman
2004-10-16 16:03 ` Roland Dreier
2004-10-16 16:36 ` Pierre Ossman
2004-10-16 17:51 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] <fa.dvqma04.n40gos@ifi.uio.no>
2004-10-16 1:46 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] <fa.hf0cjfr.n3qt2d@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.doac9ep.1ckig8r@ifi.uio.no>
2004-10-16 17:53 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=416FD177.1050404@redhat.com \
--to=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox