From: Avi Kivity <avi@exanet.com>
To: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Yasushi Saito <ysaito@hpl.hp.com>,
linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
suparna@in.ibm.com, Janet Morgan <janetmor@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] aio: add vectored I/O support
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:43:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4170DF18.50004@exanet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041016053721.GD17142@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Joel Becker wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 07:18:45AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
>>It is a huge performance win, at least on the 2.4-based RHEL kernel.
>>Large reads (~256K) using 4K iocbs are very slow on a large RAID, while
>>after I coded a similar patch I got a substantial speedup.
>>
>>
>
> I'd think we should fix the submission path instead. Why create
>iovs _and_ iocbs when we only need to create one? And even if we
>decided aio_readv() was still nice to keep, we'd want to fix this
>inefficiency in io_submit().
>
>
>
Using IO_CMD_READ for a vector entails
- converting the userspace structure (which might well an iovec) to iocbs
- copying all those iocbs to the kernel
- merging the iocbs
- generating multiple completions for the merged request
- copying the completions to userspace
- coalescing the multiple completions in userspace to a single completion
error handling is difficult as well. one would expect that a bad sector
with multiple iocbs would only fail one of the requests. it seems to be
non-trivial to implement this correctly.
IO_CMD_PREADV, by contrast, is very simple, intuitive, and efficient.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-16 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-14 20:10 [PATCH 1/2] aio: add vectored I/O support Yasushi Saito
2004-10-16 3:13 ` Joel Becker
2004-10-16 5:18 ` Avi Kivity
2004-10-16 5:37 ` Joel Becker
2004-10-16 8:43 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2004-10-16 16:28 ` Joel Becker
2004-10-16 17:29 ` Avi Kivity
2004-10-17 0:14 ` Joel Becker
2004-10-17 6:25 ` Avi Kivity
2004-10-16 12:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4170DF18.50004@exanet.com \
--to=avi@exanet.com \
--cc=janetmor@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ysaito@hpl.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox