From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FF128C2B5 for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 16:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746636565; cv=none; b=k37YX+tNDjJ4vZbVGyAzDllIBrqZQqyvTOVlDMb8lgROr3vo3Ytei9KGRZ162v1vvo9e2o81Y8v3cTBNGwlprkj0ba7Eq+xQZYUxfRBb9AFvqWLm+lm6bLbev1gaRLY2RUbONGAUuHnP+OXS69LRbli7ovcio7ECBBmNGouqJmQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746636565; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xapBwpQd3lw7O24kTMMdKUqbDWhVMZlF9fotjLNppJk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fCD7qW+gD7s6XOpo0z6z9XeQXTQT2mKiMAJ6yZg6WmdUir62w+OszphXvnYYi95S5DSPoTSG+GpsFlzvvkCXO/Ol+GZUEEvPlHsEnKFZUocbe29VxSFwykvjpvSwdn5ckuBR83AdCDI2eJfKw/+kIGJX0waK4PxZmaapRsN3A0I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2ED316F2; Wed, 7 May 2025 09:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.43] (eglon.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C07A3F58B; Wed, 7 May 2025 09:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4176222a-3583-4a4b-8968-0cabeba6008f@arm.com> Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 17:49:16 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/27] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl To: babu.moger@amd.com, Reinette Chatre , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand , Rex Nie , Koba Ko , Shanker Donthineni , fenghuay@nvidia.com References: <20250425173809.5529-1-james.morse@arm.com> <76b16ef7-2f37-4c30-97af-1d372b7fb251@amd.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: James Morse In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Babu, Reinette, On 02/05/2025 17:45, Moger, Babu wrote: > On 5/2/25 11:30, Reinette Chatre wrote: >> On 5/2/25 9:04 AM, Moger, Babu wrote: >>> >>> I retested the patches on a couple of AMD systems, and everything looks good. >>> >>> Tested-by: Babu Moger babu.moger@amd.com > > Correction: > > Tested-by: Babu Moger Thanks for re-testing it! >> Thank you very much. >> >>> >>> It's very likely that these patches will be merged before my ABMC series [1]. >>> >>> I'm currently working on v13 of the ABMC series and considering rebasing >>> it on top of James' v9. That could potentially eliminate one review cycle >>> during the merge process. >>> >>> What are your thoughts on this approach? >> >> Thanks for considering this. From my viewpoint this sounds like a good plan. > > Welcome. > >> I do not have insight into James's schedule to support this but from what I >> can tell this work is close to being ready for inclusion. > > Sure. Lets wait for James or Martin's response. I've got a v9 to post, rebased on top of the cpumask changes. My only question is whether to post it with the tail end of patches squashed together - to save Boris having to do it. Thanks, James