Re: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug?

Buddy Lucas
2004-10-17T18:21:08Z

On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:06:29 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> wrote:
> On 2004-10-17T20:04:21, Buddy Lucas <buddy.lucas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > [ snip ]
> >
> > Also note the examples that Stevens gives. For instance, he explicitly
> > checks for EWOULDBLOCK after a read on a nonblocking fd that has been
> > reported readable by select().
>
> The specs don't disagree with that. On a O_NONBLOCK socket, that is
> allowed.

I think the specs got to you, man!

Cheers,
Buddy