From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
To: Giuseppe Bilotta <bilotta78@hotpop.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:27:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <417E6CF3.503@techsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MPG.1be854649d4829f8989704@news.gmane.org>
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> Timothy Miller wrote:
>
>>>The reprogramability of the FPGA has many advantages, but
>>>reprogramability is not its primary purpose. The primary reason to use
>>>an FPGA is to minimize NRE for manufacturing. However, as a result,
>>>users will be able to download updates. Additionally, those who are
>
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Will the capability to apply these updates be included with the base card?
>>Will users need to purchase additional "update FPGA" hardware to do the
>>reprogramming?
>
>
> Also, what if the reprogramming goes wrong? Do I just throw the
> card away or will there be some form of recovery possible?
>
For those who are taking the risk of reprogramming it completely,
they'll already have read the schematics and instructions for using an
external device to program the PROM.
For everyone else, it's the same problem you get when programming a
motherboard goes awry. When the BIOS is hosed, you can't use the MB
until you replace the chip.
For cost reasons, we likely wouldn't socket the chip, so you'd probably
have to send it in for an RMA. We'd reprogram it, and send it back. Or
if you have a friend with the right tools, they can do it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-26 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-25 15:54 Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?] Timothy Miller
2004-10-25 20:31 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics karl.vogel
2004-10-25 20:34 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?] Jeff Garzik
2004-10-25 22:45 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-27 18:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-10-27 19:04 ` linux-os
2004-10-29 15:48 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-29 15:46 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-26 13:09 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2004-10-26 15:27 ` Timothy Miller [this message]
2004-10-26 15:26 ` linux-os
2004-10-26 16:04 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] ` <6.1.2.0.1.20041026110017.021ece28@mail.javagear.com>
2004-10-26 19:21 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] ` <200410251535.27852.rmiller@duskglow.com>
[not found] ` <417D80B0.6080007@techsource.com>
[not found] ` <200410251734.39703.rmiller@duskglow.com>
2004-10-25 23:06 ` Need help and advice... " Timothy Miller
2004-10-27 18:38 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics " Daniel Phillips
2004-10-29 15:47 ` Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=417E6CF3.503@techsource.com \
--to=miller@techsource.com \
--cc=bilotta78@hotpop.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox