From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262289AbUJ0GxS (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:53:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262304AbUJ0Gus (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:50:48 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:10470 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262299AbUJ0GsI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:48:08 -0400 Message-ID: <417F4497.3020205@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:47:51 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Wedgwood CC: LKML , Chris Wedgwood , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [RFC] Rename SECTOR_SIZE to IDE_SECTOR_SIZE References: <20041027060828.GA32396@taniwha.stupidest.org> In-Reply-To: <20041027060828.GA32396@taniwha.stupidest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chris Wedgwood wrote: > The token SECTOR_SIZE is used in multiple places that have (almost) > the same defintion everywhere. > > How do people feel about rename this vague token? It's highly silly to rename the same name + the same value to multiple different names. Put it in a common header somewhere, and only rename the oddballs (if any). Jeff