From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] of: mdio: Honor hints from MDIO bus drivers
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:48:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <417fdaa1-7aba-e646-8a50-043322f1410d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6de72d4c-5634-f3d6-5bfd-fcc0acda0b83@gmail.com>
On 04/11/2017 04:23 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 04:14 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> To give some more background and rational for this change.
>>>
>>> On a platform where we have a parent MDIO bus, backed by the
>>> mdio-bcm-unimac.c driver, we also register a slave MII bus (through
>>> net/dsa/dsa2.c) which is parented to this UniMAC MDIO bus through an
>>> assignment of of_node. This slave MII bus is created in order to
>>> intercept reads/writes to problematic addresses (e.g: that clashes with
>>> another piece of hardware).
>>>
>>> This means that the slave DSA MII bus inherits all child nodes from the
>>> originating master MII bus. This also means that when the slave MII bus
>>> is probed via of_mdiobus_register(), we probe the same devices twice:
>>> once through the master, another time through the slave.
>>
>> Ah, O.K. This makes more sense. On the hardware i have, we get three
>> deep in MDIO busses. We have the FEC mdio bus. On top of that we have
>> a gpio-mux-mdio, and on top of that we have the mv88e6xxx mdio
>> bus. And i've never seen issues.
>>
>> So your real problem here is you have two mdio busses using the same
>> device tree properties. I would actually say that is just plain
>> broken.
>
> From a Device Tree/HW representation perspective, we do have the
> external BCM53125 switch physically attached to the 7445/7278
> SWITCH_MDIO bus (backed by mdio-bcm-unimac) so in that regard the
> representation is correct. There is also an integrated Gigabit PHY
> (bcm7xxx) which is attached to that bus.
>
> From a SW perspective though, we want to talk to the integrated Gigabit
> PHY using mdio-bcm-unimac but talk to the external BCM53125 switch using
> the slave MII bus created by the bcm_sf2 driver in order to create an
> isolation. We need to inherit some of the parent (mdio-bcm-unimac) child
> DT nodes (such as the BCM53125), but not the GPHY. The easiest solution
> I found was to use this patch.
>
> Using mdiobus_register() instead of of_mdiobus_register() was
> considered, but then, the child BCM53125 has no more "visbility" into
> the OF world at all, and it matters, because this switch is also driven
> via a DSA switch driver and its Ethernet data-path is connected to one
> port of the bcm_sf2 switch..
>
> Thankfully the HW bug was fixed eventually ;)
In fact, all I need is to flag the internal Gigabit PHY for the slave
MII bus node with something that makes it appear as "disabled" which I
can presumably do with of_update_property() and putting a status =
"disabled" property in there. Let me do something like that and see how
big of a hack this becomes.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 21:42 [RFC net-next] of: mdio: Honor hints from MDIO bus drivers Florian Fainelli
2017-04-11 22:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-04-11 23:14 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-11 23:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-04-12 21:48 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2017-04-12 22:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-12 23:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-04-13 21:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-04-13 23:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-04-13 16:49 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=417fdaa1-7aba-e646-8a50-043322f1410d@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox