Re: [PATCH] [CPU-HOTPLUG] convert cpucontrol to be a rwsem

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> [CPU-HOTPLUG] Use a rw-semaphore for serializing and locking
> 
> Currently, lock_cpu_hotplug serializes multiple calls to cpufreq->target()
> on multiple CPUs even though that's unneccessary. Even further, it
> serializes these calls with totally unrelated other parts of the kernel...
> some ppc64 event reporting, some cache management, and so on. In my opinion
> locking should be done subsystem (and normally data-)specific, and disabling
> CPU hotplug should just do that.
> 
> This patch converts the semaphore cpucontrol to be a rwsem which allows us 
> to use it for _both_ variants: locking (write) and (multiple) other parts 
> disabling CPU hotplug (read).
> 
> Only problem I see with this approach is that lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible()
> needs to disappear as there is no down_write_interruptible() for rw-semaphores.
> 

I think I've got a patch somewhere to implement _interruptible operations
on rwsems.