public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] deprecate pci_module_init
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 20:12:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41898215.4040809@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041104005107.GA15301@kroah.com>

Greg KH wrote:
> In short, pci_module_init() on 2.4 would return the number of pci
> devices bound to the device, on 2.6, it just always returns 0 if the
> driver was successfully registered, no knowledge of how many devices
> bound are ever returned.


Incorrect.  pci_register_driver() is the inconsistent one, as I've 
explained before (months ago).

pci_module_init() always returns 0 or an errno-based value, in 2.4 or 
2.6.  Thus is it the portable alternative.

Thus, changing drivers -away from- pci_module_init() makes them less 
portable, for zero apparent gain.  It's just a #define symbol at this 
point, leave it be.

The cost of "#define pci_module_init pci_register_driver" is zero, while 
the cost and impact of changing tons of drivers to the non-portable 
variant is non-zero.

	Jeff



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-11-04  1:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-03  9:10 [PATCH] deprecate pci_module_init Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-03 17:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-03 19:07   ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-03 19:13     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-03 19:20       ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-04  0:21       ` Greg KH
2004-11-04  0:37         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-04  0:51           ` Greg KH
2004-11-04  0:53             ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-04  1:12             ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-11-03 20:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-03 20:49   ` Chris Wedgwood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41898215.4040809@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox