public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2004@gmx.net>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: errors during umount make SysRq fail
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 18:43:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <419101BE.1070400@gmx.net> (raw)

Hi,

having removed an USB disk while umount for it was still running (yes,
that was stupid) I noticed that umount for this device hangs forever in
D state. That would be ok (consequences for user error), however *all*
other umounts I attempt also hang in D state and SysRq-U also hangs,
resulting in a broken system on the next reboot.

I assume the locking against concurrent umount is there to protect
against non-trivial namespace problems and makes sense for normal
umounting, but IIRC SysRq-U is there to ensure consistent filesystems
on the next startup. Would it make sense to allow SysRq-U to break
these locks?

Similar problem exists with SysRq-S. If syncing of one device hangs,
it will never proceed to the next one in the list. I agree that one
is not trivial (stacked devices, loop et al), but can't we make a
best effort to sync at least the physical devices in the machine?
Please don't shoot me for talking about physical devices, I know
there are some really grey areas trying to define that.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel
-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2004-11-09 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-09 17:43 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [this message]
2004-11-11 19:04 ` errors during umount make SysRq fail Pavel Machek
2004-11-12 15:27   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=419101BE.1070400@gmx.net \
    --to=c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2004@gmx.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox