From: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@in.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] do_wait fix for 2.6.10-rc1
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:50:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41934AE8.7040008@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411100903290.2301@ppc970.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Dinakar Guniguntala wrote:
>
>
>>How about if we set the flag only in the cases when the exit state is not
>>either TASK_DEAD or TASK_ZOMBIE.
>>
>>
>
>Why TASK_DEAD? We can't reap such a process anyway, no? But yes, I agree
>with the approach.
>
> Linus
>
>
Linus,
Yes, when we see a process in TASK_DEAD state, we can't reap it. We
shouldn't set the flag in this scenario because we have not really found
an eligible child (one in any state other than TASK_DEAD). So we need to
go back to parsing the list of children as if we have not found an
eligible child at all.
Please let us know if this argument is correct and if we have reached
the final shape for this fix.
Thanks,
Sripathi.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-11 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-05 9:57 [PATCH] do_wait fix for 2.6.10-rc1 Sripathi Kodi
2004-11-05 10:03 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411051101500.30457@ppc970.osdl.org>
2004-11-08 14:27 ` Sripathi Kodi
2004-11-08 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-08 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-08 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-09 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-09 14:31 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2004-11-09 16:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-10 14:35 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2004-11-10 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-11 11:20 ` Sripathi Kodi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41934AE8.7040008@in.ibm.com \
--to=sripathik@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox