From: Jan Dittmer <jdittmer@ppp0.net>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI fixes for 2.6.10-rc1
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:45:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4195E5AC.7030904@ppp0.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041113102205.A646@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 11:03:15AM +0100, Jan Dittmer wrote:
>
>>Russell King wrote:
>>
>>>Why is this needed? pci_bus_add_devices() is designed to only add new
>>>devices to the device tree - new devices have an empty dev->global_list.
>>>
>>>Just calling pci_bus_add_devices() for the parent bus should suffice.
>>
>>The device got removed from bus->devices, so I can't call that.
>
>
> This sounds very wrong. Why did it get removed from bus->devices ?
>
> If it isn't on bus->devices, how does pci_bus_add_device() help?
> Sure you get it onto the global list and into the device tree,
> but it won't be attached to the parent bus properly.
>
> I think what you want to be using is:
>
> int __devinit pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
>
> to discover the new device, which will do the right thing from the
> point of setting stuff up before calling pci_bus_add_device*().
>
I don't see how pci_scan_slot helps me here. I already call
pci_scan_single_device which seems just about the same.
Thanks, Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-13 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-12 23:20 [BK PATCH] PCI fixes for 2.6.10-rc1 Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:21 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-12 23:22 ` Greg KH
2004-11-13 9:12 ` Russell King
2004-11-13 10:03 ` Jan Dittmer
2004-11-13 10:22 ` Russell King
2004-11-13 10:45 ` Jan Dittmer [this message]
2004-11-13 10:48 ` Russell King
2004-11-13 10:58 ` Jan Dittmer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-13 7:33 James Tabor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4195E5AC.7030904@ppp0.net \
--to=jdittmer@ppp0.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox