Re: [PATCH] Regparm for x86 machine check handlers

["Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Brian Gerst wrote:
> 
>>The patch to change traps and interrupts to the fastcall convention 
>>missed the machine check handlers.
> 
> 
> Thanks, that was silly.
> 
> Anybody want to write a script that verifies that the only remaining 
> "asmlinkage" entries are of the type "sys_xxxx()"? 

Is part of the problem definition missing here?
or I missed it?

E.g., printk() and vprint() are asmlinkage but not sys_xyz()...
but I have a suspicion that they are OK.

> "grep" shows that there's a number of incorrect ones left, but most of 
> them seem to take no arguments, so ir doesn't matter. And there's the FP 
> emulation stuff, which really -does- use the old interfaces.

so ignore the FP emulation, ignore functions with no arguments, right?

and omit "asmlinkage.*sys_xyz".  that leaves a handful of functions
which are <asm>, like:

acpi_status asmlinkage acpi_enter_sleep_state(u8 sleep_state);
csum_partial(), csum_partial_copy_generic(),
schedule_tail(), aes_enc_blk(), aes_dec_blk().

I don't see others than need to be fixed, but a script
would be a safer way to check, so I'm trying to nail down
the requirements ... and what tool to use, like is there
already a PERL [or python or xyz] script that parses C,
or would you *coff* recommend sparse?

-- 
~Randy