From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:55:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <419FF598.9080606@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1100995616.27157.44.camel@gaston>
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>It still doesn't address Greg's issue about making this apply to the
>>pci_bus_* functions as well, but I'm not sure of a good way to do that
>>due to the reasons given earlier.
>
>
> Looks good to me, I don't sure we actually have to deal with pci_bus_*
> functions, do we ? When are they called ?
For what we are trying to solve, which is blocking userspace config
accesses, I don't think we do. Greg - are you ok with this?
>>+void pci_block_config_access(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>+{
>>+ unsigned long flags;
>>+
>>+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
>>+ dev->block_cfg_access = 1;
>>+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
>>+}
>
>
> Shouldn't we save the config space here ?
I thought about that when coding this up and thought it would
be better to simply have the function do what it advertises and no
more. Seems strange that a function called pci_block_config_access
would go and do a bunch of pci config accesses, but we can
certainly add it if you like.
-Brian
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-21 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-19 20:23 [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST brking
2004-11-19 21:32 ` Greg KH
2004-11-19 22:25 ` Brian King
2004-11-19 22:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-19 23:22 ` Brian King
2004-11-20 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-19 22:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-20 2:27 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-20 7:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-20 12:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-20 22:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-20 23:38 ` Brian King
2004-11-21 0:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-21 1:55 ` Brian King [this message]
2004-11-21 7:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-21 17:22 ` Brian King
2004-12-03 15:26 ` Brian King
2004-11-24 11:49 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-25 22:00 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-11-25 21:11 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=419FF598.9080606@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox