From: Ray Bryant <raybry@sgi.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>, Dean Roe <roe@sgi.com>,
Brian Sumner <bls@sgi.com>,
John Hawkes <hawkes@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: scalability of signal delivery for Posix Threads
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:25:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A23D15.3040207@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041122171932.GA19440@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com>
Robin Holt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 09:51:15AM -0600, Ray Bryant wrote:
>
>>We've encountered a scalability problem with signal delivery. Our
>>application
>>is attempting to use ITIMER_PROF to deliver one signal per clock tick to
>>each
>>thread of a ptrheaded (NPTL). These threads are created with CLONE_SIGHAND,
>>so that there is a single sighand->siglock for the entire application.
>
>
> Ray, can you provide a simple example application that trips this case?
I'll do that, but it may be after the Thanksgiving holiday when I get it
out to the mailing list. It's a minor thing, but the test we are using
now is an OpenMP application (written in .c) and I'd propose rewriting
it using POSIX threads without OpenMP for a more general audience
--
Best Regards,
Ray
-----------------------------------------------
Ray Bryant
512-453-9679 (work) 512-507-7807 (cell)
raybry@sgi.com raybry@austin.rr.com
The box said: "Requires Windows 98 or better",
so I installed Linux.
-----------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-22 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-22 15:51 scalability of signal delivery for Posix Threads Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 16:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-22 19:49 ` [Lse-tech] " Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 19:53 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 16:22 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 16:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-22 16:54 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 18:56 ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 19:22 ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 17:23 ` Philip J. Mucci
2004-11-22 17:19 ` Robin Holt
2004-11-22 19:25 ` Ray Bryant [this message]
2004-11-23 20:42 ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 21:27 ` [Lse-tech] " Rick Lindsley
2004-11-22 23:39 ` Ray Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41A23D15.3040207@sgi.com \
--to=raybry@sgi.com \
--cc=bls@sgi.com \
--cc=hawkes@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=roe@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox