From: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <prakashkc@gmx.de>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:04:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A44071.9040101@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041124082736.E6205230@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1210 bytes --]
Nathan Scott schrieb:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:13:18AM +0100, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
>>using ck's preemp big kernel lock?) I got following using a raid0 setup
>>with xfs. I thought it would be a driver issue, but reformatting to ext3
>>the stripe array runs now w/o probs for a few days. (xfs crapped out
>>after a few hours on heavy disk activity.)
>>...
>>Nov 21 10:10:45 tachyon end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 10480855
>>Nov 21 10:10:45 tachyon I/O error in filesystem ("md0") meta-data dev
>>md0 block 0x13fd990 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 8192
>
>
> This looks like your driver passed an error back up to the
> filesystem while it was doing metadata IO and XFS chose to
> shut it down to prevent further damage. It's unlikely to
> be a preempt/xfs problem. Possibly hardware. Did you see
> any of those device errors since switching to ext3?
No. That's why I am wondering. I read about such errors like I got
before in lkml and usually they were not fs related but libata siimage
driver related. It could be just a coincidence that it came up with xfs,
but till now (I guess 5 days now, though not 24/7 running) ext3 is
behaving nicely.
bye,
Prakash
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-24 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-22 14:30 [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption Jan De Luyck
2004-11-22 15:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-23 10:13 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-11-23 19:13 ` Lee Revell
2004-11-23 19:22 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-11-23 21:27 ` Nathan Scott
2004-11-24 8:04 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam [this message]
2004-11-24 12:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2004-11-25 7:28 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-11-22 23:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2004-11-23 6:36 ` Jan De Luyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41A44071.9040101@gmx.de \
--to=prakashkc@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=lkml@kcore.org \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox