public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] kill unused call_irq()
@ 2004-11-14 10:46 Christoph Hellwig
  2004-11-20 17:35 ` Russell King
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2004-11-14 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rmk; +Cc: linux-kernel

These routine in arm and arm26 is unused (in fact not even compiled).

Inatead of converting it to local_softirq_pending I'd suggest just
removing it as below as it's been there totally unused for a long time.


Inatead of converting it to local_softirq_pending I'd suggest just
removing it as below as it's been there totally unused for a long time.


--- 1.8/include/asm-arm/mach/irq.h	2003-08-05 21:35:12 +02:00
+++ edited/include/asm-arm/mach/irq.h	2004-11-14 11:48:41 +01:00
@@ -97,23 +97,6 @@ void __set_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
 void set_irq_chip(unsigned int irq, struct irqchip *);
 void set_irq_flags(unsigned int irq, unsigned int flags);
 
-#ifdef not_yet
-/*
- * This is to be used by the top-level machine IRQ decoder only.
- */
-static inline void call_irq(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int irq)
-{
-	struct irqdesc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
-
-	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
-	desc->handle(irq, desc, regs);
-	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
-
-	if (softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()))
-		do_softirq();
-}
-#endif
-
 #define IRQF_VALID	(1 << 0)
 #define IRQF_PROBE	(1 << 1)
 #define IRQF_NOAUTOEN	(1 << 2)
--- 1.1/include/asm-arm26/irqchip.h	2003-06-04 13:14:10 +02:00
+++ edited/include/asm-arm26/irqchip.h	2004-11-14 11:48:53 +01:00
@@ -85,23 +85,6 @@ void __set_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
 void set_irq_chip(unsigned int irq, struct irqchip *);
 void set_irq_flags(unsigned int irq, unsigned int flags);
 
-#ifdef not_yet
-/*
- * This is to be used by the top-level machine IRQ decoder only.
- */
-static inline void call_irq(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int irq)
-{
-	struct irqdesc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
-
-	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
-	desc->handle(irq, desc, regs);
-	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
-
-	if (softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()))
-		do_softirq();
-}
-#endif
-
 #define IRQF_VALID	(1 << 0)
 #define IRQF_PROBE	(1 << 1)
 #define IRQF_NOAUTOEN	(1 << 2)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kill unused call_irq()
  2004-11-14 10:46 [PATCH] kill unused call_irq() Christoph Hellwig
@ 2004-11-20 17:35 ` Russell King
  2004-11-27  0:34   ` Ian Molton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2004-11-20 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig, Ian Molton; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 11:46:27AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> These routine in arm and arm26 is unused (in fact not even compiled).
> 
> Inatead of converting it to local_softirq_pending I'd suggest just
> removing it as below as it's been there totally unused for a long time.

I've applied the ARM bit... Ian - please handle ARM26 bit below.  Thanks.

--- 1.1/include/asm-arm26/irqchip.h	2003-06-04 13:14:10 +02:00
+++ edited/include/asm-arm26/irqchip.h	2004-11-14 11:48:53 +01:00
@@ -85,23 +85,6 @@ void __set_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
 void set_irq_chip(unsigned int irq, struct irqchip *);
 void set_irq_flags(unsigned int irq, unsigned int flags);
 
-#ifdef not_yet
-/*
- * This is to be used by the top-level machine IRQ decoder only.
- */
-static inline void call_irq(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int irq)
-{
-	struct irqdesc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
-
-	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
-	desc->handle(irq, desc, regs);
-	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
-
-	if (softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()))
-		do_softirq();
-}
-#endif
-
 #define IRQF_VALID	(1 << 0)
 #define IRQF_PROBE	(1 << 1)
 #define IRQF_NOAUTOEN	(1 << 2)

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] kill unused call_irq()
  2004-11-20 17:35 ` Russell King
@ 2004-11-27  0:34   ` Ian Molton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Molton @ 2004-11-27  0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-kernel

Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 11:46:27AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
>>These routine in arm and arm26 is unused (in fact not even compiled).
>>
>>Inatead of converting it to local_softirq_pending I'd suggest just
>>removing it as below as it's been there totally unused for a long time.
> 
> 
> I've applied the ARM bit... Ian - please handle ARM26 bit below.  Thanks.

Applied. thanks.

(wow, arm26 is a mes right now - only 3 minor versions and it needed a 
ton of fixes. I gotta push some  of my patch(es) mainline-ward...)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-27  0:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-14 10:46 [PATCH] kill unused call_irq() Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-20 17:35 ` Russell King
2004-11-27  0:34   ` Ian Molton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox