Re: Suspend 2 merge

Pavel Machek
2004-12-01T10:10:19Z

Hi!

> > > > >>Putting only the absolutely necessary things into the kernel (the same
> > > > >>is true for the interactive resume thing - if someone wants interactive
> > > > >>startup at a failing resume, he has to use an initrd, i don't see a
> > > > >>problem with that) will probably increase the acceptance a bit :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > That's fine if your initrd is properly configured and you're willing to
> > > >
> > > > This is something distributions have to take care of.
> > >
> > > No; it's something the users will have to take care of. Distro makers
> > > might make the process more automated, but in the end it's the user's
> > > problem if it doesn't work.
> >
> > Actually, no, its not like that.
> >
> > User will click icon in KDE, and if it does not suspend & resume
> > properly, distribution has problem to fix. And yes, it works well in
> > SUSE9.2.
>
> I didn't know you had support for initramfs and initrd configurations
> already. You are making progress.

Well, no, not that one.

OTOH for SUSE9.2 these things basically can not happen. (There's no
wrong kernel you can click on ;-) -- either you boot normally, then
there's just one kernel to boot, or you boot failsafe, and then you
want to kill signatures etc.)
Pavel

--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!