From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261921AbUK3B1u (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:27:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261923AbUK3B1u (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:27:50 -0500 Received: from [210.77.38.126] ([210.77.38.126]:42117 "EHLO ns.turbolinux.com.cn") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261921AbUK3B1s (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:27:48 -0500 Message-ID: <41ABCC42.4080400@turbolinux.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:26:26 +0800 From: bobl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031231 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is this a bug of vt_ioctl ?? References: <41AAD28B.2070301@turbolinux.com> <20041129132615.0564c013.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20041129132615.0564c013.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > bobl wrote: > >>we can see in the case PIO_UNIMAPCLR, One parameter of con_clear_unimp >>is "fg_console"! it's current tty! In the implement of >>do_unimap_ioctl(), use "fg_console" too! Use "console" will be right! > > > This was fixed almost a year ago. > > >>The attachment is a patch against 2.6.8.1. > > > Maybe you're looking at a 2.4 kernel. > Sorry! It's my fault! What i am looking is 2.6.0! So sorry! Bob