From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261593AbULBL1S (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:27:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261590AbULBL1R (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:27:17 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:56011 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261589AbULBL1O (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:27:14 -0500 Message-ID: <41AEFC02.3070309@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 06:26:58 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: Adrian Bunk , davem@redhat.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove dp83840.h References: <20041129111943.GB9722@stusta.de> <20041129113613.GA2718@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20041129113613.GA2718@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:19:43PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > >>dp83840.h is included once but none of the definitions it contains is >>actually used. >> >>Is the patch below to remove it OK, or is there any usage planned? > > > I would suggest to keep the file as documentation of the DP83840. that's what the kernel archives are for ;-) A while back I used google to find http://gkernel.sourceforge.net/specs/national_semi/DP83840A.pdf.bz2 Jeff