Re: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2

P
2004-12-06T17:45:37Z

Robert Love wrote:
>>The reason I proposed my ideas for tying the two values together is
>>that I am
>>concerned about breaking existing code.
>
>
> Nothing should break.
>
> If apps don't explicitly set their i/o priority, then they get the
> default. Not a big deal.
>
> This allows the default case to be the same as today.
>
> Robert Love

For reference, this was discussed last year:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106847268508985&w=2

--
Pádraig Brady - http://www.pixelbeat.org
--