Re: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2

Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-06T12:31:32Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --]

Jens Axboe schrieb:
> On Mon, Dec 06 2004, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>this one crapped out on me, while having heavy disk activity. (updating
>> gentoo portage tree - rebuilding metadata of it). Unfortunately I
>>couldn't save the oops, as I had no hd access anymore and X would freeze
>>a little later...(and I don't want to risk my data a second time...)
>
>
> Did you save anything at all? Just the function of the EIP would be
> better than nothing.

Nope, sorry. I hoped it would be in the logs, but it seems as new cfq
went havoc, hd access went dead. And I was a bit too nervous about my
data so that I didn't write it down by hand...

> Well hard to say anything qualified without an oops :/
>
> I'll try with PREEMPT here.

If you are not able to reproduce, I will try it again on a spare
partition... Should access to zip drive stil be possible if hd's
io-scheduler is dead?

Prakash

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]