From: P@draigBrady.com
To: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>,
Jeff Sipek <jeffpc@optonline.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:42:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41B499FE.5000603@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1102351338.6052.126.camel@localhost>
Robert Love wrote:
>>The reason I proposed my ideas for tying the two values together is
>>that I am
>>concerned about breaking existing code.
>
>
> Nothing should break.
>
> If apps don't explicitly set their i/o priority, then they get the
> default. Not a big deal.
>
> This allows the default case to be the same as today.
>
> Robert Love
For reference, this was discussed last year:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106847268508985&w=2
--
Pádraig Brady - http://www.pixelbeat.org
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-06 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-04 10:49 [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2 Jens Axboe
2004-12-04 16:39 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-12-05 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 0:29 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-12-06 1:59 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-06 2:23 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-12-06 2:34 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-06 5:00 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-12-06 5:14 ` Robert Love
2004-12-06 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 12:18 ` Helge Hafting
2004-12-06 12:24 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 12:21 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-12-06 16:42 ` Robert Love
2004-12-06 17:42 ` P [this message]
2004-12-06 7:15 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 7:13 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-05 14:21 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-12-05 15:18 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-05 17:58 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-12-06 9:31 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-06 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 11:48 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-12-06 12:31 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-06 13:27 ` [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #3 Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 14:01 ` Søren Lott
2004-12-06 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 15:45 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-06 15:07 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-06 23:30 ` Ed Tomlinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41B499FE.5000603@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jeffpc@optonline.net \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox