modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Camilo A. Reyes]

Not sure if this has been raised before, but I get this error message
every time I try to load a module, it is not the modprobe program it self
causing the problem since I updated it to version 2.4.9 which is the
latest out there...

Any suggestions? Please cc me as I am not on the list.

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Ronald Hummelink]

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:51:33 -0600, Camilo A. Reyes
<camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Not sure if this has been raised before, but I get this error message
> every time I try to load a module, it is not the modprobe program it self
> causing the problem since I updated it to version 2.4.9 which is the
> latest out there...
> 
> Any suggestions? Please cc me as I am not on the list.

For 2.6 kernels you need the module-init-tools package which is
available from ftp.<yourcountry>.kernel.org or your favourite distro
vendor.
Latest version as of yesterday was 3.1

> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Sean Neakums]

"Camilo A. Reyes" <camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org> writes:

> Not sure if this has been raised before, but I get this error message
> every time I try to load a module, it is not the modprobe program it self
> causing the problem since I updated it to version 2.4.9 which is the
> latest out there...

For Linux 2.6 you will need the module-init-tools package.

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Camilo A. Reyes]

On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 09:14:15PM +0000, Sean Neakums wrote:
> "Camilo A. Reyes" <camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org> writes:
> 
> > Not sure if this has been raised before, but I get this error message
> > every time I try to load a module, it is not the modprobe program it self
> > causing the problem since I updated it to version 2.4.9 which is the
> > latest out there...
> 
> For Linux 2.6 you will need the module-init-tools package.

Thanks, I was talking 'bout the modutils package, not the mod-init-tools.

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Sean Neakums]

"Camilo A. Reyes" <camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org> writes:

> On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 09:14:15PM +0000, Sean Neakums wrote:
>> "Camilo A. Reyes" <camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org> writes:
>> 
>> > Not sure if this has been raised before, but I get this error message
>> > every time I try to load a module, it is not the modprobe program it self
>> > causing the problem since I updated it to version 2.4.9 which is the
>> > latest out there...
>> 
>> For Linux 2.6 you will need the module-init-tools package.
>
> Thanks, I was talking 'bout the modutils package, not the mod-init-tools.

And I am telling you that modutils does not work with Linux 2.6.
If you want to load modules on Linux 2.6, you need module-init-tools.

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Camilo A. Reyes]

On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 09:56:47PM +0000, Sean Neakums wrote:
> "Camilo A. Reyes" <camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 09:14:15PM +0000, Sean Neakums wrote:
> >> "Camilo A. Reyes" <camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Not sure if this has been raised before, but I get this error message
> >> > every time I try to load a module, it is not the modprobe program it self
> >> > causing the problem since I updated it to version 2.4.9 which is the
> >> > latest out there...
> >> 
> >> For Linux 2.6 you will need the module-init-tools package.
> >
> > Thanks, I was talking 'bout the modutils package, not the mod-init-tools.
> 
> And I am telling you that modutils does not work with Linux 2.6.
> If you want to load modules on Linux 2.6, you need module-init-tools.

Right, and I'm trying to find it as we speak, just wanted to clarify the
confusion on my first email. Im looking for it in ftp.us.kernel.org but
its kinda hard since there are all this different folders and things,
not really sure in which one it would be...

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Randy.Dunlap]

> Right, and I'm trying to find it as we speak, just wanted to clarify the
> confusion on my first email. Im looking for it in ftp.us.kernel.org but
> its kinda hard since there are all this different folders and things,
> not really sure in which one it would be...

I get it here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/

-- 
~Randy

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Randy.Dunlap]

Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> 
>> Right, and I'm trying to find it as we speak, just wanted to clarify the
>> confusion on my first email. Im looking for it in ftp.us.kernel.org but
>> its kinda hard since there are all this different folders and things,
>> not really sure in which one it would be...
> 
> 
> I get it here:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/
> 

but a more common location for it is this:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/module-init-tools/

-- 
~Randy

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Jan Engelhardt]

>> I get it here:
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/
>
> but a more common location for it is this:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/module-init-tools/

Best location is still your Linux distribution's ftp server or CD/DVD.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
ENOSPC

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Camilo A. Reyes]

On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 04:03:16PM -0800, Ryan Cumming wrote:
> On December 11, 2004 15:50, you wrote:
> > but a more common location for it is this:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/module-init-tools/
> 
> Or just click the first link Google returns for "module-init-tools". There are 
> 4 links to it on the first page of results alone.
> 
> -Ryan

ha, i was actually looking for modules-init-tools on google, no
wonder why it wasn't pulling up anything... thanks you all!

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Christian Kujau]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Camilo A. Reyes schrieb:
> Not sure if this has been raised before, but I get this error message
> every time I try to load a module, it is not the modprobe program it self
> causing the problem since I updated it to version 2.4.9 which is the
> latest out there...

this (and other interesting things) is described here:
http://www.linux.org.uk/~davej/docs/post-halloween-2.6.txt

- --
BOFH excuse #314:

You need to upgrade your VESA local bus to a MasterCard local bus.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBu6mP+A7rjkF8z0wRArMrAKCE7iJTNs7GRaMH9gCA+FxXc8q2twCeMk/m
kLgmyEd/V/ejATznp/e1iYA=
=yp9F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Camilo A. Reyes]

On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:14:39AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
>
> this (and other interesting things) is described here:
> http://www.linux.org.uk/~davej/docs/post-halloween-2.6.txt
> 

Wow! Now, thats the stuff! How come that's not included in the
kernel distro documentation, I'm sure lots of people that are new
to the kernel will have the same problem. Anyway thanks alot...

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Dave Jones]

On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 08:52:17PM -0600, Camilo A. Reyes wrote:

 > > this (and other interesting things) is described here:
 > > http://www.linux.org.uk/~davej/docs/post-halloween-2.6.txt
 > Wow! Now, thats the stuff! How come that's not included in the
 > kernel distro documentation, I'm sure lots of people that are new
 > to the kernel will have the same problem. Anyway thanks alot...

I've had a few people asking me to submit it, but I'm not
convinced it would be worthwhile.  Would people read it if
they had problems ?

make modules_install prints out a warning pointing them at it,
yet as this thread indicates, not everyone bothers to go there
and read it.  Maybe if it was in-tree things would be different,
but I'm not convinced. People want things to 'just work'
rather than have to read about how to make them work.

That said, if it was in-tree it would be easier for people
other than myself to update it as things change.
The current doc is a little out of date (last changed
about 6 months ago), so probably needs a little work
before its ready for submission.

Is there enough interest in this from people to justify
me putting any effort into it ?  If theres any value in
having this in tree, I'll submit the current version
to Andrew for -mm, and see if anyone dives in and starts
chopping/changing things.

If this does happen, it'd probably be worth eventually
replacing Documentation/Changes with it.

		Dave

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Bernd Eckenfels]

In article <20041212033119.GC1921@redhat.com> you wrote:
> Is there enough interest in this from people to justify
> me putting any effort into it ?  If theres any value in
> having this in tree, I'll submit the current version
> to Andrew for -mm, and see if anyone dives in and starts
> chopping/changing things.

Please make sure to fix the 404 about the ioscheduler. Sorry dont know a
valid alternative url.

Greetings
Bernd

Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9

[Christian Kujau]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bernd Eckenfels schrieb:
> Please make sure to fix the 404 about the ioscheduler. Sorry dont know a
> valid alternative url.

don't find the original mail either, but perhaps

    Documentation/block/deadline-iosched.txt will do

Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #19:

floating point processor overflow
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBvHNE+A7rjkF8z0wRAqM3AKCgquMujlBefOq+luJYbSooI01aLQCfdof2
xpWeD8RI5/IUKMIkGhOOkfc=
=Fc5v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----