From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261284AbULMRvc (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:51:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261292AbULMRvb (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:51:31 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:8643 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261284AbULMRv1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:51:27 -0500 Message-ID: <41BDD659.9070500@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:50:17 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Piszcz, Justin Michael" CC: Patrick , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Andrew Morton , "Kristofer T. Karas" , Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Unknown Issue. References: <2E314DE03538984BA5634F12115B3A4E01BC4179@email1.mitretek.org> In-Reply-To: <2E314DE03538984BA5634F12115B3A4E01BC4179@email1.mitretek.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Piszcz, Justin Michael wrote: > Ah, good question, yes I used xfs_repair, at this point I knew I had to > restore from backup and answered "y" to all questions. I am not sure > but I do not recall the log being dirty. Hm, xfs_repair does not ask any questions. > In the logs on my main machine, it showed the following when it > attempted to mount the two filesystems (root and boot, /dev/hde4 and > /dev/hde1 respectively). > Dec 5 08:23:53 jpiszcz kernel: XFS internal error > XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 1583 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller > 0xc021de57 (having trouble replaying the log here) Ok, so XVM has found something wrong at this point. Any chance the box had a power failure? Write caches on ide drives can wreak havoc with journaling filesystems... i.e. what happened between "the filesystem was working" and "i remounted the filesystem and got this" > > As far as bad disk/memory, I have tested both systems with memtest86 and > the result was 0 errors, as far as the disks go, I have not experienced > any problems with either of them until I moved to 2.6.9/2.6.10-rc{1,2}. ok -Eric