From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261269AbULQPYz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:24:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261309AbULQPYz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:24:55 -0500 Received: from webapps.arcom.com ([194.200.159.168]:7948 "EHLO webapps.arcom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261269AbULQPYy (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:24:54 -0500 Message-ID: <41C2FA3F.4030406@cantab.net> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:24:47 +0000 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guillaume Thouvenin CC: lkml , Andrew Morton , elsa-announce , elsa-devel , Gerrit Huizenga , Jean Pierre Dion , "lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [RFC] fork historic module References: <1103295512.7329.75.camel@frecb000711.frec.bull.fr> In-Reply-To: <1103295512.7329.75.camel@frecb000711.frec.bull.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Dec 2004 15:27:18.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5544890:01C4E44C] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Guillaume Thouvenin wrote: > Hello, > > Here is the fork historic module. This module keeps the historic about Shouldn't it be "history" (noun) instead of "historic" (adjective)? It's kinda confusing as is. David Vrabel