From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261421AbULTFPS (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:15:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261422AbULTFPR (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:15:17 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:10915 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261421AbULTFPO (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:15:14 -0500 Message-ID: <41C65EA0.7020805@osdl.org> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:09:52 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pete Zaitcev CC: Adrian Bunk , Greg KH , mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on EMBEDDED References: <20041220001644.GI21288@stusta.de> <20041220003146.GB11358@kroah.com> <20041220013542.GK21288@stusta.de> <20041219205104.5054a156@lembas.zaitcev.lan> In-Reply-To: <20041219205104.5054a156@lembas.zaitcev.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:35:42 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > >>What about a dependency of BLK_DEV_UB on USB_STORAGE=n ? > > > I have them both as 'm' in my configuration, works like a charm. ub can work like that, but it makes it darned difficult to use usb-storage like that. ub wants to bind to the devices, not usb-storage, and if ub is unloaded, usb-storage doesn't bind to them. at least that's been my experience with it. -- ~Randy