From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@ums.usu.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] parport_pc: don't mix module parameter styles
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:12:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41CE4837.5080701@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cqle2s$hrm$1@sea.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1195 bytes --]
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> Here it boots and works, but I can't say that I have done any serious
> testing. The following message appears in the kernel log:
>
> Dec 25 11:38:09 lfs parport_pc: Ignoring new-style parameters in presence of
> obsolete ones
> Dec 25 11:38:09 lfs parport_pc: VIA 686A/8231 detected
> Dec 25 11:38:09 lfs parport_pc: probing current configuration
> Dec 25 11:38:09 lfs parport_pc: Current parallel port base: 0x378
> Dec 25 11:38:09 lfs parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, using FIFO
> [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP]
> Dec 25 11:38:09 lfs parport_pc: VIA parallel port: io=0x378, irq=7
>
> I don't understand the first line, and it wasn't there in 2.6.9. Could you
> please explain what it means? I don't pass any parameters to the module. I
> use module-init-tools version 3.0 although I know it is not the latest.
Somehow parport_pc.c ended up with mixed old-style and
new-style module parameters, but mixing them is not
allowed.
Use module_param() instead of MODULE_PARM() -- cannot be mixed.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>
diffstat:=
drivers/parport/parport_pc.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[-- Attachment #2: parport_modprm.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1137 bytes --]
Use module_param() instead of MODULE_PARM() -- cannot be mixed.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>
diffstat:=
drivers/parport/parport_pc.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -Naurp ./drivers/parport/parport_pc.c~parport_modprm ./drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
--- ./drivers/parport/parport_pc.c~parport_modprm 2004-12-24 13:35:39.000000000 -0800
+++ ./drivers/parport/parport_pc.c 2004-12-25 21:03:35.123264504 -0800
@@ -3176,7 +3176,6 @@ static int __init parport_init_mode_setu
#ifdef MODULE
static const char *irq[PARPORT_PC_MAX_PORTS];
static const char *dma[PARPORT_PC_MAX_PORTS];
-static char *init_mode;
MODULE_PARM_DESC(io, "Base I/O address (SPP regs)");
module_param_array(io, int, NULL, 0);
@@ -3192,8 +3191,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(verbose_probing, "Log c
module_param(verbose_probing, int, 0644);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
+static char *init_mode;
MODULE_PARM_DESC(init_mode, "Initialise mode for VIA VT8231 port (spp, ps2, epp, ecp or ecpepp)");
-MODULE_PARM(init_mode, "s");
+module_param(init_mode, charp, 0);
#endif
static int __init parse_parport_params(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-26 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-24 22:39 Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Linus Torvalds
2004-12-25 11:11 ` Andrew Walrond
2004-12-25 12:19 ` Alan Cox
2004-12-26 11:30 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-12-26 13:45 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-12-26 19:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-26 19:39 ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-26 20:27 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-12-26 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-13 18:09 ` 2.6.10-mm3: swsusp: out of memory on resume (was: Re: Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10) Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-13 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-13 21:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-14 14:34 ` hugang
2005-01-14 17:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-15 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-16 21:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-17 14:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-17 15:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-18 1:44 ` hugang
[not found] ` <200501150042.35377.rjw@sisk.pl>
2005-01-15 1:21 ` hugang
[not found] ` <200501151147.32919.rjw@sisk.pl>
[not found] ` <200501152220.42129.rjw@sisk.pl>
2005-01-16 5:54 ` hugang
2005-01-16 10:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-16 14:46 ` hugang
2005-01-17 15:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-17 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-12-30 9:58 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-12-26 15:45 ` Alan Cox
2004-12-29 12:44 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-12-26 2:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-12-26 3:36 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <1104171962.18174.28.camel@d845pe>
2004-12-28 16:38 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 (irq18) Bill Davidsen
2004-12-26 4:19 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-12-26 5:12 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2004-12-26 20:35 ` Greg Norris
2004-12-27 1:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-12-28 2:36 ` Greg Norris
2004-12-27 16:10 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-12-28 1:04 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Håkan Lindqvist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41CE4837.5080701@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrakov@ums.usu.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox