From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: eliminate rcu_data.last_qsctr
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:37:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D2CF3B.4040304@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41AA0D5F.21CB9ED3@tv-sign.ru>
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>last_qsctr is used in rcu_check_quiescent_state() exclusively.
>We can reset qsctr at the start of the grace period, and then
>just test qsctr against 0.
>
>
>
It seems the patch got lost, I've updated it a bit and resent it to Andrew.
But: I think there is the potential for an even larger cleanup, although
this would be more a rewrite:
Get rid of rcu_check_quiescent_state and instead use something like this
in rcu_qsctr_inc:
static inline void rcu_qsctr_inc(int cpu)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu);
if (rdp->quiescbatch != rcp->cur) {
/* a new grace period is running. And we are at a quiescent
* point, so complete it
*/
spin_lock(&rsp->lock);
rdp->quiescbatch = rcp->cur;
cpu_quiet(rdp->cpu, rcp, rsp);
spin_unlock(&rsp->lock);
}
}
It's just an idea, it needs testing on big systems - does reading from
the global rcp from every schedule call cause any problems? The cache
line is virtually read-only, so it shouldn't cause trashing, but who knows?
--
Manfred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-29 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-28 17:39 [PATCH] rcu: eliminate rcu_data.last_qsctr Oleg Nesterov
2004-11-29 19:00 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-12-29 15:37 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2005-01-05 18:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41D2CF3B.4040304@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox