public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Walter Liu <Walter.liu@126.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <from-linux-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is CAP_SYS_ADMIN checked by every program !?
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:52:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D37B7B.2010400@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200412291347.JEH41956.OOtStPFFNMLJVGMYS@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>

Tetsuo Handa wrote:

>  Hello.
>
>I found a strange behavior with kernel 2.6.9 and later. ( I haven't tested for 2.6.8 and earlier. )
>It seems to me that every program calls capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN),
>even for programs such as cat(1) sed(1) ls(1).
>My environment is Fedora Core 3.
>
>The following is the patch for checking.
>
>----- Start of Patch -----
>*** sched.h.org Sat Dec 25 06:33:59 2004
>--- sched.h     Wed Dec 29 13:00:53 2004
>***************
>*** 870,875 ****
>--- 870,882 ----
>  #else
>  static inline int capable(int cap)
>  {
>+       if (cap == CAP_SYS_ADMIN) {
>+               static pid_t last_pid = 0;
>+               if (current->pid != last_pid) {
>+                       printk("euid=%d uid=%d %s %s\n", current->euid, current->uid, cap_raised(current->cap_effective, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? "true" : "fa
>lse", current->comm);
>+                       last_pid = current->pid;
>+               }
>+       }
>        if (cap_raised(current->cap_effective, cap)) {
>                current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
>                return 1;
>----- End of Patch -----
>
>Programs run as root always show "true", and run as non-root always show "false",
>but it's will be OK.
>I can't understand why every program checks for CAP_SYS_ADMIN .
>With 2.4.28 and RedHat 9, no such behavior happens.
>
>Is this normal behavior for 2.6 ?
>
>  
>
The POSIX capability mechanism  is  the OS privilege  mechanism ,
like the privilege mechanism in  VMS  or NT .
I think that every process  for  any capability  have to check them,
This is a must operation..

Regards
LWT


  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-30  3:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-29  4:47 Is CAP_SYS_ADMIN checked by every program !? Tetsuo Handa
2004-12-30  3:52 ` Walter Liu [this message]
2004-12-30  4:45 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-12-30  5:35 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-12-30  5:46   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-12-30  6:13     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-12-30  7:40   ` Tetsuo Handa
2004-12-30  8:24     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-01-03 13:52     ` Stephen Smalley
2004-12-30 13:37 ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41D37B7B.2010400@126.com \
    --to=walter.liu@126.com \
    --cc=from-linux-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox