From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:41:21 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D3B121.1020600@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d8e3fd304122923362d823e34@mail.gmail.com>
Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:20:28 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
>>Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Andrew,
>>> what's your plan for the staircase scheduler ?
>>
>>I have none, frankly. I haven't seen any complaints about the current
>>scheduler.
>>
>>If someone can identify bad behaviour in the current scheduler which
>>staircase improves then please describe a tescase which the scheduler
>>developers can use to reproduce the situation.
>>
>>If, after that, we deem that the problem cannot be feasibly fixed within the
>>context of the current scheduler and that the problem is sufficiently
>>serious to justify wholesale replacement of the scheduler then sure,
>>staircase is an option.
>
>
> Your answer makes lot of sense.
> I think Con can explain the pro and cons of the staircase scheduler.
I agree fully with Andrew. I'm not going there while we have 2.6 forever
development.
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-30 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-25 11:31 Trying out SCHED_BATCH Rajsekar
2004-12-25 11:41 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-29 20:14 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2004-12-29 20:28 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-29 22:46 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-12-29 22:56 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-30 7:12 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-12-30 7:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-30 7:36 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-12-30 7:41 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-12-30 16:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-01-02 0:26 ` Peter Williams
2004-12-25 11:46 ` Matan Peled
2004-12-25 18:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-12-25 23:09 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41D3B121.1020600@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com \
--cc=solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox