From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Fryderyk Mazurek <dedyk@go2.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com
Subject: Re: Problems with 2.6.10
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:21:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D5FB14.8090704@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041230164546.987845674D@rekin12.go2.pl>
Fryderyk Mazurek wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm sorry, but acpi=routeirq doesn't work. But to my head came other
> thing. I noticed that I on 2.6.9 (which correct works) I have this
> part of dmesg:
Not surprised, that should be pci=routeirq, as in the original post. Do
you have preempt on?
>
> hdb: Host Protected Area detected.
> current capacity is 66055248 sectors (33820 MB)
> native capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB)
> hdb: 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63,
> UDMA(33)
>
> and on 2.6.10 I have:
>
> hdb: Host Protected Area detected.
> current capacity is 66055248 sectors (33820 MB)
> native capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB)
> hdb: Host Protected Area disabled.
> hdb: 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63,
> UDMA(33)
>
> How see, first is 32GB (33820 MB), and second is 40GB (40020MB).
> Correct value should be 32GB, in spite that my disk is 40GB. I want
> to say, that I have a little old BIOS and my BIOS detect only 32GB,
> therefore I have limited size of my disk. And maybe kernel 2.6.10
> influence on my BIOS and force to detect 40GB, which is not
> operable, because my BIOS is too old. I think that maybe to fix it I
> should force my kernel to detect only 32GB, how on kernel 2.6.9.
> Maybe this is a BUG of new kernel?
>
> Fryderyk.
>
> ---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ----
> Od: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
> Do: Fryderyk Mazurek <dedyk@go2.pl>
> Kopia do: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Data: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:14:02 -0500
> Temat: Re: Problems with 2.6.10
>
>
>>Fryderyk Mazurek wrote:
>>
>>>Hello.
>>>
>>>My kernel 2.6.10 I compiled two times. First with ACPI and second
>>>fully without ACPI. And the same situation.
>>>For me this situation is strange, because usually reset should help,
>>>but not this time. I thought that maybe my BIOS is too old. But with
>>>2.6.9 works. Therefore I don't know. Now I use 2.6.9.
>>>
>>>Fryderyk.
>>>
>>>---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ----
>>>Od: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>>>Do: Fryderyk Mazurek <dedyk@go2.pl>
>>>Kopia do: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>Data: 27 Dec 2004 21:44:11 -0500
>>>Temat: Re: Problems with 2.6.10
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 12:11, Fryderyk Mazurek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>problem starts when I do reboot. On boot screen my bios can't
>
> detect
>
>>>>>my disk. Bios stops and nothing.
>>>>
>>>>Does reboot work if the initial boot is with acpi=off?
>>
>>With that system, perhaps acpi=ht would be better if he uses the
>
> HT. And
>
>>pci=routeirq may help as well, although it told me it was disabling
>>IRQ18 and didn't!
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-01 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-27 17:11 Problems with 2.6.10 Fryderyk Mazurek
2004-12-27 19:44 ` Pedro Venda (SYSADM)
2004-12-28 2:44 ` Len Brown
2004-12-28 14:56 ` Fryderyk Mazurek
2004-12-30 2:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-12-30 16:45 ` Fryderyk Mazurek
2005-01-01 1:21 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-01-01 18:41 ` Fryderyk Mazurek
2004-12-28 14:27 ` Alan Cox
2004-12-28 16:49 ` Fryderyk Mazurek
[not found] <fa.b02ekp9.12i8ti1@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ekat19o.emk580@ifi.uio.no>
2005-01-02 0:20 ` Bodo Eggert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-05 9:59 problems " bil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41D5FB14.8090704@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=dedyk@go2.pl \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox