From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262168AbVAABKX (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:10:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262169AbVAABKX (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:10:23 -0500 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([216.238.38.203]:6600 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262168AbVAABKJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:10:09 -0500 Message-ID: <41D5FB14.8090704@tmr.com> Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:21:24 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fryderyk Mazurek CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com Subject: Re: Problems with 2.6.10 References: <41D3646A.9020806@tmr.com><20041228145600.6A9FC193D36@r10.go2.pl> <20041230164546.987845674D@rekin12.go2.pl> In-Reply-To: <20041230164546.987845674D@rekin12.go2.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fryderyk Mazurek wrote: > Hello! > > I'm sorry, but acpi=routeirq doesn't work. But to my head came other > thing. I noticed that I on 2.6.9 (which correct works) I have this > part of dmesg: Not surprised, that should be pci=routeirq, as in the original post. Do you have preempt on? > > hdb: Host Protected Area detected. > current capacity is 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) > native capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) > hdb: 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, > UDMA(33) > > and on 2.6.10 I have: > > hdb: Host Protected Area detected. > current capacity is 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) > native capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) > hdb: Host Protected Area disabled. > hdb: 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63, > UDMA(33) > > How see, first is 32GB (33820 MB), and second is 40GB (40020MB). > Correct value should be 32GB, in spite that my disk is 40GB. I want > to say, that I have a little old BIOS and my BIOS detect only 32GB, > therefore I have limited size of my disk. And maybe kernel 2.6.10 > influence on my BIOS and force to detect 40GB, which is not > operable, because my BIOS is too old. I think that maybe to fix it I > should force my kernel to detect only 32GB, how on kernel 2.6.9. > Maybe this is a BUG of new kernel? > > Fryderyk. > > ---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ---- > Od: Bill Davidsen > Do: Fryderyk Mazurek > Kopia do: Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Data: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:14:02 -0500 > Temat: Re: Problems with 2.6.10 > > >>Fryderyk Mazurek wrote: >> >>>Hello. >>> >>>My kernel 2.6.10 I compiled two times. First with ACPI and second >>>fully without ACPI. And the same situation. >>>For me this situation is strange, because usually reset should help, >>>but not this time. I thought that maybe my BIOS is too old. But with >>>2.6.9 works. Therefore I don't know. Now I use 2.6.9. >>> >>>Fryderyk. >>> >>>---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ---- >>>Od: Len Brown >>>Do: Fryderyk Mazurek >>>Kopia do: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>Data: 27 Dec 2004 21:44:11 -0500 >>>Temat: Re: Problems with 2.6.10 >>> >>> >>> >>>>On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 12:11, Fryderyk Mazurek wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>problem starts when I do reboot. On boot screen my bios can't > > detect > >>>>>my disk. Bios stops and nothing. >>>> >>>>Does reboot work if the initial boot is with acpi=off? >> >>With that system, perhaps acpi=ht would be better if he uses the > > HT. And > >>pci=routeirq may help as well, although it told me it was disabling >>IRQ18 and didn't! -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979