* 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch does not include supermount
@ 2005-01-03 15:46 Rajsekar
2005-01-03 21:06 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rajsekar @ 2005-01-03 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I tried out 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch. The patches directory suggests that the
supermount patch is applied but AFAIK they are not applied. I had to
manually apply the patch (downloaded the diff from con kolivas's site).
Sorry if I am terribly mistaken.
--
Rajsekar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch does not include supermount
2005-01-03 15:46 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch does not include supermount Rajsekar
@ 2005-01-03 21:06 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-01-03 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rajsekar; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 476 bytes --]
Rajsekar wrote:
> I tried out 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch. The patches directory suggests that the
> supermount patch is applied but AFAIK they are not applied. I had to
> manually apply the patch (downloaded the diff from con kolivas's site).
Correct. I maintain the patch so that it is alive and well because many
(of us) use it. However I don't include it in the -ck patchset by
default since I reserve -ck for patches that affect performance in some
way only.
Cheers,
Con
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-03 21:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-03 15:46 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch does not include supermount Rajsekar
2005-01-03 21:06 ` Con Kolivas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox