* 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch does not include supermount
@ 2005-01-03 15:46 Rajsekar
2005-01-03 21:06 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rajsekar @ 2005-01-03 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I tried out 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch. The patches directory suggests that the
supermount patch is applied but AFAIK they are not applied. I had to
manually apply the patch (downloaded the diff from con kolivas's site).
Sorry if I am terribly mistaken.
--
Rajsekar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch does not include supermount 2005-01-03 15:46 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch does not include supermount Rajsekar @ 2005-01-03 21:06 ` Con Kolivas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-01-03 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rajsekar; +Cc: linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 476 bytes --] Rajsekar wrote: > I tried out 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch. The patches directory suggests that the > supermount patch is applied but AFAIK they are not applied. I had to > manually apply the patch (downloaded the diff from con kolivas's site). Correct. I maintain the patch so that it is alive and well because many (of us) use it. However I don't include it in the -ck patchset by default since I reserve -ck for patches that affect performance in some way only. Cheers, Con [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-03 21:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-01-03 15:46 2.6.10-rc1 ck1 patch does not include supermount Rajsekar 2005-01-03 21:06 ` Con Kolivas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox