From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: sfrench@samba.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net,
samba-technical@lists.samba.org, aia21@cantab.net,
hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAT, NTFS, CIFS and DOS attributes
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:24:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D9C635.1090703@zytor.com> (raw)
Hello all,
I recently posted to LKML a patch to get or set DOS attribute flags for
fatfs. That patch used ioctl(). It was suggested that a better way
would be using xattrs, although the xattr mechanism seems clumsy to me,
and has namespace issues.
I also think it would be good to have a unified interface for FAT, NTFS
and CIFS for these attributes.
I noticed that CIFS has a placeholder "user.DosAttrib" in cifs/xattr.c,
although it doesn't seem to be implemented.
Questions:
a) is xattr the right thing? It seems to be a fairly complex and
ill-thought-out mechanism all along, especially the whole namespace
business (what is a system attribute to one filesystem is a user
attribute to another, for example.)
b) if xattr is the right thing, shouldn't this be in the system
namespace rather than the user namespace?
c) What should the representation be? Binary byte? String containing a
subset of "rhsvda67" (barf)?
-hpa
next reply other threads:[~2005-01-03 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-03 22:24 H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2005-01-03 23:26 ` FAT, NTFS, CIFS and DOS attributes Michael B Allen
2005-01-03 23:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-03 23:48 ` Michael B Allen
2005-01-03 23:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-04 0:18 ` tridge
2005-01-04 0:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-04 0:39 ` tridge
2005-01-04 0:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-04 1:12 ` tridge
2005-01-04 1:31 ` Nicholas Miell
2005-01-04 1:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-04 2:05 ` Nicholas Miell
2005-01-04 22:24 ` [Linux-NTFS-Dev] " Szakacsits Szabolcs
2005-01-04 1:21 ` tridge
2005-01-04 1:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-03 23:28 ` Nicholas Miell
2005-01-04 0:05 ` tridge
2005-01-04 0:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-04 0:58 ` tridge
2005-01-04 1:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-04 1:36 ` tridge
2005-01-04 1:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-04 2:05 ` tridge
2005-01-04 2:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-04 2:23 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-01-04 2:49 ` tridge
2005-01-04 3:39 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-01-04 3:56 ` tridge
2005-01-04 4:50 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-01-04 4:05 ` Michael B Allen
2005-01-04 10:34 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-01-04 11:08 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-01-04 22:18 ` Nicholas Miell
2005-01-04 23:04 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-01-05 0:48 ` Nicholas Miell
2005-01-05 1:12 ` Nicholas Miell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41D9C635.1090703@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=aia21@cantab.net \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox