Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

Paul Davis
2005-01-11T22:53:26Z

>But I'm also still not convinced this policy can't be most flexibly
>handled by a setuid helper together with the mlock rlimit.

This has been explained several times already.

When you run a JACK client, the user should not be required to use a
different command sequence depending on whether or not JACK is running
with RT scheduling or not. That's almost more arcane than the current
situation and is a step backwards from even 2.4, where we use
capabilities to allow JACK itself to pass on the ability to use RT
scheduling and memlock to its clients.

--p