From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262547AbVAKDGy (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:06:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262587AbVAKDF1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:05:27 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com ([66.75.162.135]:1184 "EHLO ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262412AbVAKDDY (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:03:24 -0500 Message-ID: <41E341FA.5040508@clones.net> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:03:22 -0800 From: Glendon Gross User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glendon Gross CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UDF Support interfering with IDE boot? References: <41E337DA.7080107@clones.net> In-Reply-To: <41E337DA.7080107@clones.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org As a follow up to my own post, I built a kernel without UDF support to test my theory and found that the boot failed with the same error, "unknown block". So now I am in the process of building a new kernel after starting from my old config.gz from /proc. At least I know that UDF support had nothing to do with the problem.