From: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Nathan Lynch <nathanl@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: vamsi_krishna@in.ibm.com, prasanna@in.ibm.com,
suparna@in.ibm.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kprobes /proc entry
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:09:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E46ACE.2040101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050111213400.GB18422@kroah.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greg KH ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:31:17PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 12:14, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:25:38PM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>>>
>>>>This simple patch adds a new file in /proc, listing every kprobe which
>>>>is currently registered in the kernel. This patch is checked against
>>>>kernel 2.6.10
>>>
>>>No, please do not add extra /proc files to the kernel. This belongs in
>>>/sys, as it has _nothing_ to do with processes.
>>
>>Wouldn't this sort of thing be a good candidate for debugfs? If you're
>>messing with kprobes, then aren't you by definition doing kernel
>>debugging? :)
>
>
> That's an even better idea, I like it.
>
> greg k-h
>
Good, I'll work on it ASAP.
Thank you for your suggestions!
Luca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQeRqzRZrwl7j21nOAQJrFQf/RnBUDTsju6LLcYRdM6RYiyrnydTBJWtw
Q3MuNE9S/kiwmFpCJjshV9tazJ+dA29pxuqt+Wg2aGkqSSVgq8KuuF1uSLIlaatM
n0ZSZ/tnOEJoQtlI32azik+PYVQkHHcr2HMN5ruThRO3uCJfHuYZEGEGaUkZQRa+
ORGrVgXSoLVCQmenIOaXHDW1UNOdKb1IgyU4HBpjL8zVUWOLTB7jbtxghC5rDgHP
BV9AYP0GaeIb7Xy5l/bcfngU+teKE75ht+ew5xzX3Ee0Sz9G5a5YVvWJTecHSyeq
id4WK0etFHp8qufX/gcGr0uTY8gpxF8GCzwcU8KCr32Y6vvLlVKzxQ==
=BXBj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-12 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 16:25 [PATCH] Kprobes /proc entry Luca Falavigna
2005-01-10 18:14 ` Greg KH
2005-01-11 21:31 ` Nathan Lynch
2005-01-11 21:34 ` Greg KH
2005-01-12 0:09 ` Luca Falavigna [this message]
2005-01-12 6:35 ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-01-12 9:49 ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-01-13 23:20 ` Luca Falavigna
2005-01-13 23:34 ` Greg KH
2005-01-17 16:58 ` Luca Falavigna
2005-01-18 6:44 ` Greg KH
2005-01-20 14:13 ` Luca Falavigna
2005-01-14 0:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41E46ACE.2040101@gmail.com \
--to=dktrkranz@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathanl@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=vamsi_krishna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox