public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christos gentsis <christos_gentsis@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: root <root@mail.gadugi.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cherokee Nation Posts Open Source Legisation - Invites comments from Community Members
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:03:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E4CBC3.4070302@yahoo.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200501061935.j06JZMq4013855@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:37:25 CST, root said:
> 
> 
>>It's based on the design of the license.  Under Cherokee Nation Law, you
>>can have and claim trade secrets in public code released under a public
>>license.  This makes it very easy for individual contributors to 
>>enforce their rights in the US.  We spent months researching this, and yes,
>>it holds up under our laws.  
> 
> 
> You will have trouble with "rights in the US", because of the definition of
> "trade secret" includes 18 USC 1839 (3):
> 
> (3) the term "trade secret" means all forms and types of financial,
> business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information,
> including patterns, plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, designs,
> prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, or codes,
> whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled, or
> memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically, or in
> writing if --
> 
> (A) the owner thereof has taken reasonable measures to keep such information secret; and
> 
> (B) the information derives independent economic value, actual or potential,
> from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through
> proper means by, the public; and
> 
> You'll have a hard time convincing a jury not on the reservation that publishing
> something as open source is at all a "reasonable measure to keep it secret".
> 
> In fact, you're going to have a hard time - if you're not a sovereign nation,
> then 18 USC 1839 will trump your law.  And if you *are* a sovereign nation,
> you better get some lobbyists that can read and understand the implications
> of 19 USC 2242(a)(1)(A) and/or 19 USC 2242(b)(1).....

hello all

sorry about this question but i didn't understand something in all this 
"trade secret" situation...

first: Is there any impact in GNU GPL?

second: does this US law means that everything could be a "trade 
secret"? even something like the  GUI? or a process bar? and in case 
that someone will register them what is going to happens?

third: this under US law, is it applied in EU etc????

thanks for your time
Christos




  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-12  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-06 18:04 Cherokee Nation Posts Open Source Legisation - Invites comments from Community Members root
2005-01-06 18:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-01-06 18:37   ` root
2005-01-06 19:35     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-01-06 20:31       ` OT Re: Cherokee Nation Posts Open Source Legisation Stephen Pollei
2005-01-06 21:32         ` root
2005-01-06 21:55           ` Måns Rullgård
2005-01-06 22:27             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-01-06 23:16             ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-01-06 22:27           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-01-07  2:16             ` root
2005-01-07 13:03           ` Helge Hafting
2005-01-07 18:00             ` root
2005-01-08 14:17               ` Helge Hafting
2005-01-12  7:03       ` christos gentsis [this message]
2005-01-12  8:49         ` Cherokee Nation Posts Open Source Legisation - Invites comments from Community Members Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-01-12 17:18           ` root
2005-01-12 20:17             ` Stephen Pollei
2005-01-12 21:05               ` jmerkey
2005-01-13  8:21             ` Daniel Egger
2005-01-12 18:19         ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-01-16 16:13         ` Rik van Riel
2005-01-16 20:25           ` Werner Almesberger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-06 18:26 root
2005-01-06 19:44 Stephen Warren
2005-01-06 20:19 ` linux-os

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41E4CBC3.4070302@yahoo.co.uk \
    --to=christos_gentsis@yahoo.co.uk \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=root@mail.gadugi.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox