Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

Andreas Steinmetz
2005-01-08T22:29:51Z

Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 11:56 -0500, ross@lug.udel.edu wrote:
>
>>Not to mention that not everyone chooses to use PAM for precisely this
>>reason. Slackware has never included PAM and probably never will.
>>My audio workstation has worked swell with the 2.4+caps solution and
>>the 2.6+LSM solution. PAM would break me ::-(
>
>
> Hmm. How could you (for example) configure all your machines to
> authenticate against an LDAP server without PAM?

nss_ldap :-)

--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap@domdv.de