Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

Chris Wright
2005-01-07T21:38:21Z

* Matt Mackall (mpm@selenic.com) wrote:
> Feh. The RT scheduling class issue is orthogonal. Addressing mlock and
> scheduling class at once (and nothing else) is actually an ugliness of
> your LSM approach as there are folks who want mlock and not RT.

Last I checked they could be controlled separately in that module. It
has been suggested (by me and others) that one possible solution would
be to expand it to be generic for all caps.

thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net