Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

Alan Cox
2005-01-07T03:00:47Z

On Gwe, 2005-01-07 at 01:13, Matt Mackall wrote:
> You can't fix them without changing the semantics for existing users
> in ways they didn't expect. It could be done with a new personality flag,
> but..

I disagree. At the most trivial you could just add another 32bits of
sticky capability that are never touched by setuid/non-setuidness and
represent additional "user" (or more rightly session) abilities to do
limited overrides