Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

Lee Revell
2005-03-08T21:54:36Z

On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 21:20 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:55:55PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > And as I mentioned a few times, the authors have neither the inclination
> > nor the ability to do that, because they are not kernel hackers. The
> > realtime LSM was written by users (not developers) of the kernel, to
> > solve a specific real world problem. No one ever claimed it was the
> > correct solution from the kernel POV.
>
> And I told you that doesn't matter. If someone wants a feature in they
> should find a way to make it palable. We're not accepting such excuses
> to put in crap.
>

Fine. Consider it a proof of concept. I'm satisfied if any solution
gets merged, it doesn't have to be this one.

I am still confused about why the LSM framework was merged in the first
place.

Lee