public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Breakage with raid in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 [Regression in mm]
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:56:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E7F9DB.8070707@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050115014139.01dab5e0@tornado.reub.net>

Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> At 12:58 a.m. 15/01/2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
>> Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Something seems to have broken with 2.6.11-rc1-mm1, which worked ok 
>> with
>> > 2.6.10-mm3.
>> >
>> > NET: Registered protocol family 17
>> > Starting balanced_irq
>> > BIOS EDD facility v0.16 2004-Jun-25, 2 devices found
>> > md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
>> > md: autorun ...
>> > md: ... autorun DONE.
>> > VFS: Waiting 19sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 18sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 17sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 16sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 15sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 14sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 13sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 12sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 11sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 10sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 9sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 8sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 7sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 6sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 5sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 4sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 3sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 2sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Waiting 1sec for root device...
>> > VFS: Cannot open root device "md2" or unknown-block(0,0)
>> > Please append a correct "root=" boot option
>> > Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 
>> unknown-block(0,0)
>> >
>> > The system is running 5 RAID-1 partitions, and md2 is the root as per
>> > grub.conf.  Problem seems to be that raid autodetection finds no raid
>> > partitions :(
>> >
>> > The two ST380013AS SATA drives are detected earlier in the boot, so 
>> I don't
>> > think that's the problem..
>>
>> hm, the only raidy thing we have in there is the below.  Maybe you could
>> try reverting that?
>>
>>
>> --- 25/drivers/md/raid5.c~raid5-overlapping-read-hack   2005-01-09 
>> 22:20:40.211246912 -0800
>> +++ 25-akpm/drivers/md/raid5.c  2005-01-09 22:20:40.216246152 -0800
>> @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ static struct stripe_head *__find_stripe
>>  }
>>
>>  static void unplug_slaves(mddev_t *mddev);
>> +static void raid5_unplug_device(request_queue_t *q);
>>
>>  static struct stripe_head *get_active_stripe(raid5_conf_t *conf, 
>> sector_t sector,
>>                                              int pd_idx, int noblock)
> 
> 
> Ok the breakage occurred somewhere between 2.6.10-mm3 (works) and 
> 2.6.11-rc1 (doesn't work) ie wasn't introduced into the latest -mm 
> patchset as I first thought.
> 
> Are there any other patches that might be worth a try backing out?

Someone else reported that they had to back out this one:
waiting-10s-before-mounting-root-filesystem.patch

Can you revert that one and let us know how it goes?

-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-14 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-14 10:50 Breakage with raid in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 [Regression in mm] Reuben Farrelly
2005-01-14 11:58 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-14 12:18   ` Reuben Farrelly
2005-01-14 12:43   ` Reuben Farrelly
2005-01-14 16:56     ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-01-15 12:21       ` Sander
     [not found] <fa.h2tu7ia.m3ir1o@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.kv41q3p.1nn82gh@ifi.uio.no>
2005-01-16 11:02   ` Reuben Farrelly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41E7F9DB.8070707@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    --cc=reuben-lkml@reub.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox