From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261850AbVASTDI (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:03:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261853AbVASTDH (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:03:07 -0500 Received: from [207.168.29.180] ([207.168.29.180]:64677 "EHLO jp.mwwireless.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261850AbVASS7T (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:59:19 -0500 Message-ID: <41EEAE04.3050505@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:59:16 -0800 From: Steve Longerbeam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen Cc: Hugh Dickins , linux-mm , linux-kernel Subject: Re: BUG in shared_policy_replace() ? References: <41EE9991.6090606@mvista.com> <20050119174506.GH7445@wotan.suse.de> <41EEA575.9040007@mvista.com> <20050119183430.GK7445@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20050119183430.GK7445@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: >>yeah, 2.6.10 makes sense to me too. But I'm working in -mm2, and >>the new2 = NULL line is missing, hence my initial confusion. Trivial >>patch to -mm2 attached. Just want to make sure it has been, or will be, >>put back in. >> >> > >That sounds weird. Can you figure out which patch in mm removes it? > > found it: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.10/2.6.10-mm1/broken-out/mempolicy-optimization.patch Steve