From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261478AbVAXKYk (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:24:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261485AbVAXKYk (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:24:40 -0500 Received: from ns1.q-leap.de ([153.94.51.193]:45501 "EHLO mail.q-leap.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261478AbVAXKYe (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:24:34 -0500 Message-ID: <41F4CCE0.5010709@q-leap.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:24:32 +0100 From: Peter Kruse Organization: Q-Leap Networks GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-os@analogic.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Random packets loss under x86_64 - routing? References: <41E7E6D7.10303@q-leap.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org linux-os wrote: > > The fact that `ping -r` works seems to show that the ARP table > has stale entries in it. > > The problem is gone with 2.6.10. We can live with this solution. Thanks, Peter -- Peter Kruse , Chief Software Architect Q-Leap Networks GmbH phone: +497071-703171, mobile: +49172-6340044