From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jirka Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix bad locking in drivers/base/driver.c
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:49:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41F64E87.8040501@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41F5F623.5090903@sun.com>
Mike Waychison wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Greg KH wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 07:25:19PM +0100, Jirka Kosina wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>there has been (for quite some time) a bug in function driver_unregister()
>>>- the lock/unlock sequence is protecting nothing and the actual
>>>bus_remove_driver() is called outside critical section.
>>>
>>>Please apply.
>>
>>
>>No, please read the comment in the code about why this is the way it is.
>>The code is correct as is.
>>
>
>
> Why don't we clean this up as in the proposed attached patch (against
> 2.6.10). Compile-tested only.
Let's clean up the spelling as well
>
> - --
> Mike Waychison
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> 1 (650) 352-5299 voice
> 1 (416) 202-8336 voice
>
> Index: linux-2.6.10/drivers/base/driver.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.10.orig/drivers/base/driver.c 2004-12-24 16:35:25.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.10/drivers/base/driver.c 2005-01-25 02:16:31.000000000 -0500
> @@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ void put_driver(struct device_driver * d
> * since most of the things we have to do deal with the bus
> * structures.
> *
> - * The one interesting aspect is that we initialize @drv->unload_sem
> - * to a locked state here. It will be unlocked when the driver
> - * reference count reaches 0.
> + * The one interesting aspect is that we setup @drv->unloaded
> + * as a completion that gets complete when the driver reference
> + * count reaches 0.
> */
> int driver_register(struct device_driver * drv)
> {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drv->devices);
> - init_MUTEX_LOCKED(&drv->unload_sem);
> + init_completion(&drv->unloaded);
> return bus_add_driver(drv);
> }
>
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int driver_register(struct device_driver
> *
> * Again, we pass off most of the work to the bus-level call.
> *
> - * Though, once that is done, we attempt to take @drv->unload_sem.
> + * Though, once that is done, we wait until @drv->unloaded is copmleted.
------------------------------------------------------------------>completed
> * This will block until the driver refcount reaches 0, and it is
> * released. Only modular drivers will call this function, and we
> * have to guarantee that it won't complete, letting the driver
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-25 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-24 18:25 [PATCH] fix bad locking in drivers/base/driver.c Jirka Kosina
2005-01-24 19:00 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-25 5:56 ` Greg KH
2005-01-25 7:32 ` Mike Waychison
2005-01-25 13:49 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-01-25 16:10 ` Mike Waychison
2005-01-25 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-25 19:19 ` Greg KH
2005-01-25 19:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-02-02 23:35 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41F64E87.8040501@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jikos@jikos.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox