public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Patch 4/6  randomize the stack pointer
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:34:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41F96C7D.9000506@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106862801.5624.145.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>I feel the need to point something out here.
>>
>>[TEXT][BRK][MMAP---------------][STACK]
>>
>>Here's a normal layout.
>>
>>[TEXT][BRK][MMAP-------][STACK][MMAP--]
>>
>>Is this one any worse?
> 
> 
> yes.
> 
> oracle, db2 and similar like to mmap 2Gb or more *in one chunk*.
> moving the stack in the middle means the biggest chunk they can mmap
> shrinks. 
> 

Special case?

I never said these weren't out there.  But the point is, who runs
oracle?  Your internal production server, maybe even a cluster, run it
now.  Your desktops don't.  Your web server exposed to the net
shouldn't.  Both these are exactly where you *really* want this stuff:
desktops get exposed to the WWW (and IRC and AIM and God knows what
else), and web servers get exposed to the HTTP protocol (or ftp or
whatever).

Interesting, it's theoretically far less likely that an exploit occurs
on your server than on your desktop; and the special cases such as your
Oracle example aren't likely to be sharing a machine with your
promiscuous touching of everyone else on the Internet with a web browser
and IRC client, correct?

Can I get this put into perspective?  How much more important is "Good"
randomization versus "not breaking Oracle," which becomes "No
randomization" (for Oracle anyway, not for everything else on a
well-designed system)?  How much of an effect does "good" randomization
have on your web server and desktop machines versus on your internal,
isolated RDBMS server/cluster?

More pertainantly (believe it or not), do you even care to ponder these
questions, or is your next response going to be a stock response?

> 
> 

- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB+Wx8hDd4aOud5P8RAuriAJ0WYcesi/o5lOZIJ++UG8WbDu3PMACeKaB5
/YjzHR2n0aRiUrxUrca1gkU=
=0/hv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-27 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-27 10:11 Patch 0/6 virtual address space randomisation Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 10:12 ` Patch 1/6 introduce sysctl Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 10:36   ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-27 11:13     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 18:16   ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-27 19:11     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-27 19:46       ` Dave Jones
2005-01-27 19:53         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-27 19:53         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-02-04 21:27   ` Benoit Boissinot
2005-01-27 10:12 ` Patch 2/6 introduce helper infrastructure Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 10:41   ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-27 11:58     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 12:27       ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-27 12:43         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-02-01 21:14   ` Matt Mackall
2005-01-27 10:12 ` Patch 3/6 per process flag Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 10:13 ` Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 10:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-27 17:38   ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 17:47     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 18:04       ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 18:09         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 18:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-27 18:16         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-27 18:28           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-27 18:55             ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 18:49           ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 19:30             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-27 19:48               ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 19:59                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-27 20:04                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 20:08               ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 19:19           ` linux-os
2005-01-27 19:52             ` Julien TINNES
2005-01-27 20:02             ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 20:13               ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 21:33                 ` jnf
2005-01-28 17:22                 ` Paulo Marques
2005-01-28 17:51                   ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-28 18:42                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-29  6:04                     ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 20:37               ` linux-os
2005-01-27 20:45                 ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 21:39           ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 21:53             ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 22:34               ` John Richard Moser [this message]
2005-01-29  2:50                 ` Rik van Riel
2005-01-29  6:31                   ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-29  8:10                     ` Arjan van de Ven
     [not found]                       ` <41FBB821.3000403@comcast.net>
2005-01-29 16:42                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-29 16:59                           ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-29 16:46                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-29 17:04                           ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-29 17:37                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-01-29 17:49                       ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-29 17:55                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-29 18:10                           ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-29 18:12                             ` Rik van Riel
2005-01-29 18:16                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-29  7:46           ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 18:40         ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2005-01-27 22:31     ` Jirka Kosina
2005-01-28  5:58       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-28 19:02         ` David Lang
2005-01-28  7:33       ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 19:43   ` Julien TINNES
2005-01-28  0:10     ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-28  0:23       ` Roland Dreier
2005-01-28  1:06         ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-28  2:03     ` Horst von Brand
2005-01-28  8:45       ` Julien TINNES
2005-01-27 20:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-27 20:27     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 20:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-27 20:35         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 20:40         ` Rik van Riel
2005-01-27 20:42           ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-27 20:56             ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 21:13               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-27 10:13 ` Patch 5/6 randomize mmap addresses Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 10:14 ` Patch 6/6 default enable randomisation for -mm Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 11:45 ` Patch 0/6 virtual address space randomisation Julien TINNES
2005-01-27 11:57   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-27 17:42     ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 19:34       ` Julien TINNES
2005-01-27 19:57         ` John Richard Moser
2005-01-27 20:13         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-28  8:45           ` David Weinehall
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-31 10:55 Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer linux
2005-01-31 17:28 ` John Richard Moser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41F96C7D.9000506@comcast.net \
    --to=nigelenki@comcast.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox